Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700 is 3513 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 138 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 7 7700
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
