Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2723 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 69 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 231 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 127 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |