Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 821 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 51 vs 84 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |