Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 2226 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 181 vs 180 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
180
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |