Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1316 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E-2276M - 304 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 32 vs 12 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Core i9-13900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Core i9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 24 |
| 12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
