Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 758 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Pentium P6100 - 98 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |