Buy on Amazon
$59.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $64
Availability
MSRP in USD: $64
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 2364 days newer than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than FX-8120 - 47 vs 43 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-8120 - $59.95 vs $78.02
- Up to 29% better value when playing Starfield than FX-8120 - $1.28 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T Processor 4M Cache 3.10 GHz LGA1151 (OEM Tray CPU)
Buy for $59.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
43
91.48936170212765%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
70.71823204419888%
Price, $
$78.02
76%
AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 95W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G5400T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G5400T | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
