Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1713 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 94% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $78.02 vs $1416.0
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 24% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8120 - 171 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dirt 5 than FX-8120 - $0.41 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1416
5%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,416 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |