Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400S outperforms the more expensive FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400S is 276 days older than the more expensive FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 0% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-8120 - 292 vs 291 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-8120 - $59.99 vs $78.02
- Up to 22% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than FX-8120 - $0.21 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
291
99.65753424657534%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
77.77777777777777%
Price, $
$78.02
76%
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2512 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
292
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2512 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |