Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3586 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $45.0 vs $165.91
- Up to 70% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.3 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Pentium G840 - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
29%
Price, $
$165.91
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |