Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 79% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 231 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $37.0 vs $165.86
- Up to 60% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-11600KF - $0.29 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
40%
Price, $
$165.86
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8812 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |