Key Differences
In short — Core i7-990X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-990X is 648 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-990X - $37.0 vs $178.02
- Up to 78% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-990X - $0.12 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-990X - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-990X
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610 - 322 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13552 minutes ago
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-990X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 24th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gulftown |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |