Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Pentium G630 - 188 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $37.49 vs $165.86
- Up to 76% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-11600KF - $0.21 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
23%
Price, $
$165.86
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8284 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
175
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |