Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2020 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2020 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2976 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2020.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G2020 - 453 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2020 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2020
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $34.99 vs $165.86
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600KF - $0.09 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
453
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
24%
Price, $
$165.86
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8205 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
371
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Pentium G2020 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 21st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |