Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2572 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 43% better in Dirt 5 than Core i5-4460T - 220 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $52.87 vs $165.86
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.34 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
45%
Price, $
$165.86
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8366 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
154
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |