Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Core i3-9100F - 186 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $60.99 vs $165.91
- Up to 61% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-11600KF - $0.35 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
39%
Price, $
$165.91
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $60.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |