Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-3250 - 193 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $56.34 vs $165.86
- Up to 58% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11600KF - $0.36 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
41%
Price, $
$165.86
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9126 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
158
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |