Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $47.48 vs $89.95
- Up to 29% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-10105 - $0.32 vs $0.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 34% better in Rust than Pentium G6950 - 199 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
149
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14637 minutes ago
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |