Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3411 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G645T - 135 vs 113 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
355
22.145976294447912%
Multi-Core
606
22.47774480712166%
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |