Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G640 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2130 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G640
- Up to 56% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $30.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 55% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G4900 - $0.33 vs $0.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Pentium G640 - 93 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $30 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |