Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 33% better in League of Legends than Core i3-3240T - 69 vs 52 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $25.7 vs $68.02
- Up to 51% better value when playing League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - $0.49 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |