Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2167 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $37.49 vs $221.76
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.26 vs $1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Pentium G630 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
144
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12969 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
17%
Price, $
$221.76
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G630 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |