Buy on Amazon
$28.55
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 219 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4560.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $28.55 vs $221.76
- Up to 87% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.04 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Valorant than Pentium G4560 - 751 vs 706 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4560 - 32 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
706
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$28.55
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 - 3.5 GHz - 2 cores - 4 threads - 3 MB cache - LGA1151 Socket - Box
Buy for $28.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4779 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
751
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
13%
Price, $
$221.76
12%
FPS Winner
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4780 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4560 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
