Buy on Amazon
$51.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 587 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320 - 111 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than FX-8320 - $51.36 vs $74.82
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74146 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
