Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G3250T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1074 days newer than Pentium G3250T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Pentium G3250T - 197 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250T - 64 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3250T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
