Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Pentium G3250T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 49 days newer than Pentium G3250T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Pentium G3250T - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250T - 16 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3250T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
