Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 851 days newer than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium 3825U - 162 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 64 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium 3825U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
