Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Pentium 3825U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 174 days older than Pentium 3825U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3825U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 15 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Pentium 3825U - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 3825U - 24 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3825U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |