Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 49 days older than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 96% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 4 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Core M-5Y51 - 172 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core M | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
