Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 1624 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 4 vs 15 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 2% better in Remnant II than Core M-5Y51 - 83 vs 81 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 8 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core M | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
