Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 49 days older than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 4 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in FIFA 23 than Core M-5Y51 - 126 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 8 vs 4 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core M | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |