Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G4900 - 217 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $68.02 vs $587.46
- Up to 88% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-9920X - $0.32 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
11%
Price, $
$587.46
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18575 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
211
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |