Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 174 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $39.59 vs $554.05
- Up to 92% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-9900T - $0.24 vs $3.18 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
7.547169811320755%
Price, $
$554.05
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3696 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
163
93.67816091954023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3691 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
34.263782274947665%
Multi-Core
825
13.763763763763764%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |