Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $39.59 vs $459.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10300 - $0.18 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1820 - 263 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
85.17110266159695%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
10.285714285714285%
Price, $
$459
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.37380191693291%
Multi-Core
825
17.205422314911367%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |