Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the more expensive Core i3-10300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10300 - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $124.0 vs $199.06
- Up to 39% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10300 - $0.99 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |