Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $46.41 vs $275.98
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900 - $0.07 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 18% better in Valorant than Celeron G1820 - 810 vs 687 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
687
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3734 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
810
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
20%
Price, $
$275.98
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |