Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3607 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $46.41 vs $375.74
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700KF - $0.31 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 215 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
152
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
17%
Price, $
$375.74
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |