Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $46.41 vs $353.84
- Up to 83% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-12900KF - $0.39 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 150 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
16%
Price, $
$353.84
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $353.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |