Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8086K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8086K is 1647 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-8086K - $39.59 vs $449.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-8086K - $0.18 vs $1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8086K
- Performs up to 14% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1820 - 256 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
87.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2801 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
FPS
256
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
10.285714285714285%
Price, $
$449
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 5th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
29.348475791990435%
Multi-Core
825
11.831349490893446%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-8086K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 5th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 40th |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |