Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 748 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $39.59 vs $350.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-3960X - $0.18 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1820 - 229 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
97.81659388646288%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2800 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
11.76470588235294%
Price, $
$350
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
71.15942028985506%
Multi-Core
825
24.568195354377607%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |