Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2373 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-8320 - 132 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $95.0 vs $554.05
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-9900T - $0.82 vs $4.2 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
19.523809523809522%
Price, $
$554.05
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $554.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3663 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
116
87.87878787878788%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |