Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 180 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 280 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $81.39 vs $295.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9900KF - $0.3 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18071 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18072 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |