Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Core i5-10400F - 289 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $97.5 vs $435.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900F - $0.35 vs $1.51 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
276
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$97.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $97.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |