Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 972 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i9-7960X - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $99.95 vs $347.48
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-7960X - $0.66 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for $347.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |