Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-7900X - 369 vs 366 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $99.95 vs $412.83
- Up to 76% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-7900X - $0.27 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
369
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |