Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $99.95 vs $469.9
- Up to 78% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.49 vs $2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i5-10400F - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
202
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.26/FPS
21%
Price, $
$469.9
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |