Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $99.95 vs $716.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-13700K - $0.85 vs $3.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 62% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10400F - 190 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
61%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.77/FPS
22%
Price, $
$716.98
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $716.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |