Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i7-9700F - 82 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $295.0 vs $716.98
- Up to 45% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-13700K - $4.84 vs $8.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.74/FPS
55%
Price, $
$716.98
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $716.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |