Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2803 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than FX-4130 - 280 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $52.02 vs $429.99
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $429.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |