Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 18% better in Valorant than Celeron G1820 - 810 vs 687 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $46.41 vs $273.11
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900 - $0.07 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
810
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
20%
Price, $
$273.11
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
687
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |